Skip to content

docs: document selfie check 4.0 - #166

Open
Takaros999 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
takis/document-selfie-check-4
Open

docs: document selfie check 4.0#166
Takaros999 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
takis/document-selfie-check-4

Conversation

@Takaros999

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR documents Selfie Check 4.0 across the public credential and IDKit references.

  • removes Beta and access-gating language
  • documents the new selfieCheck preset and marks selfieCheckLegacy as deprecated
  • explains sybil_score, integrity bundle version 2, and repeated-action behavior
  • updates Developer Portal API examples plus JavaScript, React, Swift, Kotlin, Mini App, and Sandbox guidance

Context

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
world 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 2, 2026, 6:28 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-02T22:12:55.138458Z dc0f5c4 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc0f5c4f8a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +1399 to +1404
"integrity_bundle": {
"description": "Required with version 2 when any response item is a Selfie Check credential (`issuer_schema_id: 11`).",
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/IntegrityBundle"
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Enforce the required integrity bundle for Selfie Check

For a request containing an issuer_schema_id: 11 response, this schema still permits integrity_bundle to be omitted because it is absent from the request's required array, and when supplied it permits version 1 through the shared IntegrityBundle enum. Consequently, generated clients and schema validation accept payloads that the description says the verification endpoint rejects; model Selfie Check as a distinct request variant that requires the bundle and constrains its version to 2.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +1527 to +1530
"sybil_score": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 0,
"description": "Versioned Selfie Check risk signal represented as an integer. Required only when `issuer_schema_id` is 11."

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Encode the required Selfie Check score in the schema

Although the new description says sybil_score is required for issuer schema 11, the field is not present in this object's required list. API documentation and generated types therefore expose the score as optional and validate a schema-11 response without it, contradicting the documented IDKit contract; use a dedicated oneOf Selfie response variant that requires sybil_score.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant