Document heartbeat_interval (SDK v2.4.0) - #18
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
snopoke
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 30, 2026 15:10
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs for taskbadger-python#58, released as v2.4.0.
Each integration page gets its own copy of the section rather than a shared page, matching how the two pages already duplicate their common material.
The Procrastinate
@tracklist now states thatrecord_task_args,heartbeat_intervalandstale_timeoutinherit from the system integration. It already claimed that forrecord_task_args, but4f4496cin that PR is what actually made it true for a task decorated before the integration is constructed.Also added an
<a name="stale_timeout">anchor indata_model.md— the field is in a definition list, so it had no anchor to link to.🤖 Generated with Claude Code