Skip to content

Verify build succeeds on pull requests#168

Merged
rob93c merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
verify-build-succeeds-on-pull-request
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

Verify build succeeds on pull requests#168
rob93c merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
verify-build-succeeds-on-pull-request

Conversation

@rob93c

@rob93c rob93c commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added automated build verification for pull requests, pushes to the main branch, and manual runs.
    • Standardized YAML file formatting preferences through editor configuration.

@rob93c
rob93c requested a review from MartelliEnrico July 20, 2026 10:33
@rob93c rob93c self-assigned this Jul 20, 2026
@rob93c rob93c added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 20, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@rob93c, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 39 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 53487a68-8107-440c-ae8d-a874bd54b75a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20441d0 and 5ee30c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml

Walkthrough

The changes add YAML formatting preferences to .editorconfig and introduce a GitHub Actions workflow that verifies builds on pull requests, pushes to main, and manual dispatches.

Changes

YAML formatting

Layer / File(s) Summary
YAML EditorConfig rules
.editorconfig
Adds YAML-specific indentation, spacing, line-break, and sequence formatting preferences.

Build verification CI

Layer / File(s) Summary
Build workflow
.github/workflows/build.yml
Adds build verification for pull requests, pushes to main, and manual dispatches using Node.js 24, npm ci, and npm run build.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers: martellienrico

Poem

I’m a rabbit with YAML lines,
And build checks hopping through pipelines.
Node twenty-four joins the race,
While tidy spaces fall in place.
CI thumps its happy feet—
Green little carrots make it sweet!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: adding CI to verify builds on pull requests.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch verify-build-succeeds-on-pull-request

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/build.yml:
- Around line 10-16: Update the build job in the workflow to restrict repository
access with contents read permission and configure the actions/checkout step
with persist-credentials disabled. Keep the existing checkout behavior and
subsequent build steps unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 495c24de-9cbe-4d36-beb0-cc27b409b3e6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d65ff1 and 20441d0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .editorconfig
  • .github/workflows/build.yml

Comment thread .github/workflows/build.yml
@rob93c
rob93c merged commit 03a9299 into main Jul 20, 2026
2 checks passed
@rob93c
rob93c deleted the verify-build-succeeds-on-pull-request branch July 20, 2026 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant