Correction
The initial Brownian S0/S1 work merged in #159 is mathematically valid as a finite random-walk and endpoint-fibre calibration, but it does not implement an AMP-native method.
Its actual structure is:
- discrete Addition histories;
- an externally described scale balance;
- exact endpoint mass pushforward.
Multiplication appears only as passive rescaling, and Power appears only as a population factor. No A/M/P word, finite flow, generator relation, closure fibre, or Log-branch residual enters the calculation. Therefore the merged result must be reclassified as PRE-AMP / discrete control.
This also reveals a weakness in the research method firewall from #157: it separates native/baseline/certificate lanes, but a caller-declared “native” grammar can omit the generators required by the research hypothesis.
Required correction
G0 — generator-aware method contract
Add a research-local grammar profile that records:
- required generator identifiers;
- finite action/flow;
- infinitesimal action or an explicit discrete non-applicability witness;
- carrier and domain;
- task role;
- branch/residual data;
- certificate;
- legal composition;
- relation/bracket witnesses;
- closure status and obligations.
An AMP profile must require exactly the generator grades A, M, and P, plus typed A-M, M-P, and A-P relations. On the positive chart it must record
A_t(x)=x+t
M_s(x)=exp(s)x
P_r(x)=exp(exp(r) Log x)
[A,M]=A
[M,P]=M
[A,P]=(1+log x) d/dx (escapes the declared span)
and must not pretend that the three generators form a three-dimensional Lie algebra.
B0 — Brownian status correction
Reclassify merged S0/S1 as a discrete control/baseline. Pause recurrence and heat-kernel work.
B1 — competing AMP charts
Freeze and execute two candidates:
- position chart: A/M/P act on the physical state. It is local on the positive real chart; symmetric Brownian histories crossing zero or becoming negative must return a typed branch/domain obstruction.
- ensemble-observer chart: a positive exponential observer carries exact shift, scale, and replica identities. Power should appear as genuine repeated independent assembly, not as the symbol
N in a balance equation.
For a finite increment law mu, test exactly:
Z_(T_t mu)(s) = exp(st) Z_mu(s)
Z_(S_lambda mu)(s) = Z_mu(lambda s)
Z_(mu^{*N})(s) = Z_mu(s)^N
The second chart retains endpoint-law information but not path observers; same endpoint/different running maximum remains a required fibre witness.
Acceptance
Claim ceiling
This correction does not yet prove that either candidate is the canonical Brownian AMP chart, does not prove a continuum limit, and does not claim a new stochastic calculus. Its purpose is to make the native method actually test the AMP hypothesis.
Correction
The initial Brownian S0/S1 work merged in #159 is mathematically valid as a finite random-walk and endpoint-fibre calibration, but it does not implement an AMP-native method.
Its actual structure is:
Multiplication appears only as passive rescaling, and Power appears only as a population factor. No A/M/P word, finite flow, generator relation, closure fibre, or Log-branch residual enters the calculation. Therefore the merged result must be reclassified as PRE-AMP / discrete control.
This also reveals a weakness in the research method firewall from #157: it separates native/baseline/certificate lanes, but a caller-declared “native” grammar can omit the generators required by the research hypothesis.
Required correction
G0 — generator-aware method contract
Add a research-local grammar profile that records:
An AMP profile must require exactly the generator grades
A,M, andP, plus typedA-M,M-P, andA-Prelations. On the positive chart it must recordand must not pretend that the three generators form a three-dimensional Lie algebra.
B0 — Brownian status correction
Reclassify merged S0/S1 as a discrete control/baseline. Pause recurrence and heat-kernel work.
B1 — competing AMP charts
Freeze and execute two candidates:
Nin a balance equation.For a finite increment law
mu, test exactly:The second chart retains endpoint-law information but not path observers; same endpoint/different running maximum remains a required fibre witness.
Acceptance
Claim ceiling
This correction does not yet prove that either candidate is the canonical Brownian AMP chart, does not prove a continuum limit, and does not claim a new stochastic calculus. Its purpose is to make the native method actually test the AMP hypothesis.