chore: simplify CODEOWNERS - #2677
Conversation
## Summary Replace path-specific ownership entries with one repository-wide rule assigning @ranadeepsingh and @BrendanWalsh. ## Prompting Intent The engineer asked to make CODEOWNERS contain only `* @ranadeepsingh @BrendanWalsh` and remove every other owner and comment. ## Linked Sources - User request in this session. ## Rationale A single global rule makes the requested reviewers responsible for every path and removes narrower overrides that would otherwise supersede it. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Azure Pipelines: There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run. |
|
Hey Rana Singh (@ranadeepsingh) 👋! We use semantic commit messages to streamline the release process. Examples of commit messages with semantic prefixes:
To test your commit locally, please follow our guild on building from source. |
7f1647a
into
microsoft:master
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Simplifies repository ownership configuration by collapsing CODEOWNERS into a single, repo-wide rule for consistent reviewer assignment.
Changes:
- Remove all path-specific CODEOWNERS entries.
- Keep a single
*rule assigning ownership to@ranadeepsinghand@BrendanWalsh.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| CODEOWNERS | Consolidates ownership rules into a single repository-wide entry. |
Review details
💡 Configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Suppressed comments (1)
CODEOWNERS:2
- The file currently has an extra blank line after the single CODEOWNERS rule. This contradicts the PR description claim that it contains exactly the requested newline-terminated rule, and it’s simpler to keep CODEOWNERS to a single non-empty line here.
* @ranadeepsingh @BrendanWalsh
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 0
- Review effort level: Lite
Related Issues/PRs
None.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Replace all path-specific
CODEOWNERSentries with one repository-wide ruleassigning
@ranadeepsinghand@BrendanWalsh.How is this patch tested?
CODEOWNERScontains exactly the requested newline-terminated rule.Does this PR change any dependencies?
Does this PR add a new feature? If so, have you added samples on website?