Skip to content

Add date-range caveat to first_open and first_series_disengagement field descriptions#563

Merged
steve-henry merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
sync/export-date-range-caveat
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

Add date-range caveat to first_open and first_series_disengagement field descriptions#563
steve-henry merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
sync/export-date-range-caveat

Conversation

@steve-henry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why?

The first_open and first_series_disengagement export stats fields were missing a key constraint: only events within the export job's requested date range are counted. Without this, developers could misinterpret the values as lifetime counts.

How?

Append the clarifying sentence to both field descriptions across all versioned spec files.

  • intercom/developer-docs#991

Generated with Claude Code

…elds

Append "Only events within the export job's requested date range are counted." to the description of these two export stats fields across all spec versions.

- intercom/developer-docs#991
type: integer
description: The first time the user opened this message.
description: The first time the user opened this message. Only events within
the export job's requested date range are counted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question as docs PR #991: the note is only on 2 of the 11 first_* fields, so the rest read as lifetime — should it cover all of them or just these two? Also the source descriptions in the monolith (app/lib/api/open_api/schemas/responses/data_export_csv.rb, lines 34 & 37) still have the old text, so spec and source will drift until those are updated too.

~ Automated via Claude

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@steve-henry steve-henry merged commit 3b5263e into main Jun 23, 2026
3 checks passed
@steve-henry steve-henry deleted the sync/export-date-range-caveat branch June 23, 2026 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants