feat(producer): version distributed plan protocol#2777
Open
jrusso1020 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The current monolithic plan layout needs to evolve before
PLAN_TOO_LARGEcan be removed safely. Rolling out a new layout without an explicit protocol risks an old assembler silently consuming only the v1 artifacts it understands (for example, omitting future externalized audio). This PR is the pixel-neutral compatibility prerequisite; it does not introduce Plan v2 or enable any new render path.Compatibility and rollout
plan-dir-v1PLAN_PROTOCOL_UNSUPPORTEDbefore layout-specific readsplanner.produces,chunk.accepts, andassembler.acceptsindependently, plus descriptor-less legacy support only for reader rolesValidation