ref(scopes): Rename sentry_capture_event_with_scope => sentry_scope_capture_event

[limbonaut]

Renames sentry_capture_event_with_scope to sentry_scope_capture_event to match the sentry_scope_capture_x family, with the scope as the first argument. The old name stays as a deprecated forwarder that keeps the original (event, scope) order, so existing callers keep working and get a warning pointing them to the new function.

[jpnurmi]

@tustanivsky heads-up: a small deprecation/rename coming. results in nice and consistent sentry_scope_capture_xxx

[limbonaut]

@jpnurmi should I frame this as a breaking change in the changelog?

[limbonaut]

I added an inline "Breaking" marker in the changelog, since we have a compatibility forwarder.

Reframed as breaking change.

Under "Deprecations" section now.

[jpnurmi]

I wouldn't necessarily consider a deprecation breaking (even if it technically can break -Werror builds) as long as the old API remains functional. For example, it would be hard to deprecate APIs planned for removal in the next major version ahead of time if the deprecation itself needed another major release. :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.56%. Comparing base (59cb293) to head (2668247).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1882      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.56%   75.56%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines       21188    21191       +3     
  Branches     3764     3764              
==========================================
+ Hits        16010    16012       +2     
- Misses       4350     4353       +3     
+ Partials      828      826       -2     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.