Skip to content

chore: bump label-checker to v1.6.66 - #1081

Merged
paullatzelsperger merged 1 commit into
eclipse-edc:mainfrom
paullatzelsperger:chore/bump_label_checker
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

chore: bump label-checker to v1.6.66#1081
paullatzelsperger merged 1 commit into
eclipse-edc:mainfrom
paullatzelsperger:chore/bump_label_checker

Conversation

@paullatzelsperger

@paullatzelsperger paullatzelsperger commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR changes/adds

Bumps agilepathway/label-checker from v1.6.65 to v1.6.66 in the scan-pull-request workflow.

Why it does that

The action builds its Docker image from source on every run against Debian bullseye. After bullseye LTS ended (2026-08-31), the bullseye-security repository's Release file expired and is no longer re-signed, so apt-get update inside the image build fails deterministically and the check-for-assigned-labels job errors out on every PR event before ever evaluating labels (see e.g. https://github.com/eclipse-edc/IdentityHub/actions/runs/34204179470/job/101991639663). v1.6.66, released today, fixes the image build (agilepathway/label-checker#492).

v1.6.65 builds its Docker image against Debian bullseye, whose security
repository metadata expired after bullseye LTS ended, breaking the
check-for-assigned-labels job on every PR. v1.6.66 fixes the build
(agilepathway/label-checker#492).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016hZeCWzWwHyt2SwLPGn3zX
@paullatzelsperger
paullatzelsperger requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2026 09:21
@paullatzelsperger
paullatzelsperger merged commit 82111c9 into eclipse-edc:main Sep 8, 2026
18 of 22 checks passed
@paullatzelsperger
paullatzelsperger deleted the chore/bump_label_checker branch September 8, 2026 09:56
@ndr-brt

ndr-brt commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@paullatzelsperger maybe we should use the reusable action defined in the .github repo as done in the other repos

@paullatzelsperger

paullatzelsperger commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@paullatzelsperger maybe we should use the reusable action defined in the .github repo as done in the other repos

@ndr-brt check this: #1082

@ndr-brt

ndr-brt commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@paullatzelsperger maybe we should use the reusable action defined in the .github repo as done in the other repos

@ndr-brt check this: #1082

sorry, I'm a little behind 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants