feature: updates pull request bypass coverage mentions OD-219

[pedrobpereira]

Updates coverage status checks mentions in the bypass pull request status checks section.

👀 Live preview https://feature-coverage-bypass-od-219--docs-codacy.netlify.app

• If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
• Perform a self-review of the changes
• Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation regarding bypassing Codacy status checks, clarifying that the bypass applies to gates enforcing both quality and coverage checks, and simplifies the note by removing the workaround recommendation for coverage blocks. I have no feedback to provide as there are no review comments.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.26 (🟢 +0.02)

File	Readability
can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md	39.19 (🟢 +5.78)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md	39.19	35.81	15.21	15.8	11.73	8.66
	🟢 +5.78	🟢 +1.01	🟢 +1.67	🟢 +0.9	🟢 +0.52	🟢 +0.22

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.26	43.17	10.89	12.3	12.24	8.01
	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates the FAQ entry about bypassing the Codacy status check, clarifying how the bypass relates to coverage-related gates during pull request checks.

Changes:

• Updates the note to mention coverage checks (in addition to quality checks) in the context of bypassing the Codacy status check.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

This pull request successfully updates the documentation to specify that bypassing Codacy status checks applies to both quality and coverage gates. The changes align with the requirement to remove outdated workarounds and clarify that the bypass is no longer limited to quality checks alone. Codacy analysis confirms that the PR is up to standards.

About this PR

• The PR description is empty and contains only the default template instructions. Please provide a brief summary of the changes to assist future maintainers.

Test suggestions

• Verify that the documentation explicitly mentions 'quality and coverage checks' in the bypass note.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}