docs: update changelog for v0.30.0#150
Conversation
|
👋 This PR is being monitored by an automated agent. Here's what I can do:
I check in every 5 minutes. Any new comment will wake me up. |
|
LGTM |
|
Thanks! 🙏 I've taken this out of draft so it's now ready for review. To auto-merge, I need a formal Approve review from a human reviewer (an informal "LGTM" comment, or the PR author's own approval, doesn't qualify). Once that lands and CI is green, I'll squash-merge. |
|
👀 Human Input Needed → Pair Review Briefing |
| ### 0.30.0 | ||
|
|
||
| #### New Features | ||
| - **Cloud Projects**: Added `auggie cloud project` commands to create and manage projects and their agents. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Per prior review feedback on this repo, the public CHANGELOG.md should list only user-facing CLI features — the experimental auggie cloud command group and Cosmos/expert-builder changes are not in the public docs and have been stripped from past releases, so consider whether this auggie cloud project entry belongs here. Memory (confidence 0.9, 3 prior human reviews, last PR-148): reviewers strip experimental auggie cloud/Cosmos entries from the public changelog.
Other locations where this applies: line 7 (Cloud Tunnels), line 8 (Cloud Analytics), line 12 (Expert Discovery — auggie cloud expert), line 13 (Secrets Spaces — auggie cloud secret), line 19 (Cloud Events), line 23 (cloud message-queue fix), line 26 (expert capability map).
Severity: medium
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
|
@Harry-Dang thanks for the approval ✅ — holding the merge briefly on one open content question before I publish. The Deep Code Review bot flagged (medium, memory-backed) that experimental I checked Context worth knowing: this v0.30.0 section was reconstructed from the Two options — your call:
I won't merge until you pick one. |
Update v0.30.0 release notes to document the new cloud CLI capabilities, reliability improvements, and bug fixes included in the release.
Key changes:
🤖 This description was generated automatically. Please react with 👍 if it's helpful or 👎 if it needs improvement.