feat: Add support for writing bloom filters

[renaudb]

Closes #850

Note: This PR is currently held back by boto requiring pyarrow<=23.1 as bloom filter write support was added in pyarrow 24.

Rationale for this change

Add support for writing bloom filters to parquet files. This changes leverages the new bloom_filter_options write_parquet argument in pyarrow 24.

Are these changes tested?

Added tests for the metadata parsing. Added a very basic test for the writing path (there is currently no way to test for the existence of a bloomfilter in a parquet file using pyarrow).

Are there any user-facing changes?

N/A

[Fokko]

Thanks for working on this @renaudb. I've noticed that in the uv.lock we're behind some versions of boto3/botocore, not sure why this. Maybe we can bump this with uv sync --upgrade manually (in a separate PR).

[renaudb]

@Fokko the issue is with Bodo, not Boto. Bodo forces pyarrow>=23.0,<23.1. I saw a bunch of issues filed on their hand about how this is too restrictive, but it looks like they are limited in changing it.

https://github.com/bodo-ai/Bodo/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L9

[renaudb]

@Fokko this should be ready for review.

[abnobdoss]

Would it make sense to assert pq.ParquetWriter is called with bloom_filter_options?

[renaudb]

Added a check that the filter offset and and length exist in the underlying files. However, this requires pyarrow 25 which won't be officially released for a few days.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that's incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.