Skip to content

ci: run workflows on 19.0-staging-* branches - #376

Merged
gonzalesedwin1123 merged 1 commit into
19.0from
ci-staging-branch-filters
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

ci: run workflows on 19.0-staging-* branches#376
gonzalesedwin1123 merged 1 commit into
19.0from
ci-staging-branch-filters

Conversation

@gonzalesedwin1123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

The security-fix campaign (18+ open security PRs) will be merged to 19.0 in validated batches via staging branches named 19.0-staging-* (e.g. 19.0-staging-sec-batch1). PRs are retargeted to the staging branch, reviewed and merged there one at a time, the batch is validated (full CI + upgrade tests + human test), and only then is the staging branch merged into 19.0 — keeping 19.0 stable for the deployments that track it directly.

All four workflows currently trigger only on 19.0, so a PR targeting a staging branch would get zero checks (green-by-absence). This adds the 19.0-staging-* wildcard to the pull_request and push filters of:

  • ci.yml
  • pre-commit.yml
  • security.yml
  • code-analysis.yml

The wildcard is permanent infrastructure: future staging campaigns reuse the naming pattern with no further CI changes. (* in Actions globs doesn't match /, hence a dash-based naming convention.)

Notes

  • No job logic changes; ci.yml already resolves the PR base dynamically via github.base_ref, and no workflow has other hardcoded 19.0 refs (verified by grep).
  • This PR must merge before the first staging branch is cut, since staging branches inherit the workflow files from 19.0 at cut time.
  • Smoke test after merge: cut a throwaway 19.0-staging-ci-test branch, open a scratch PR against it, confirm all four workflows trigger, close and delete.

Security fixes will be validated in batches on staging branches
(19.0-staging-*) before merging to 19.0. Without this, PRs retargeted
to a staging branch get no CI runs at all.
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.79%. Comparing base (1caf794) to head (14b0e4c).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 19.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             19.0     #376      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.28%   67.79%   -6.50%     
==========================================
  Files         372       94     -278     
  Lines       25385     8312   -17073     
==========================================
- Hits        18857     5635   -13222     
+ Misses       6528     2677    -3851     
Flag Coverage Δ
spp_analytics ?
spp_api_v2_cycles ?
spp_api_v2_entitlements ?
spp_api_v2_gis ?
spp_api_v2_programs ?
spp_api_v2_simulation ?
spp_audit_programs ?
spp_base_common 91.07% <ø> (+0.80%) ⬆️
spp_case_demo ?
spp_case_entitlements ?
spp_case_programs ?
spp_cr_type_assign_program ?
spp_dci_compliance ?
spp_dci_demo ?
spp_dci_server_social ?
spp_demo ?
spp_demo_phl_luzon ?
spp_drims ?
spp_drims_sl ?
spp_drims_sl_demo ?
spp_farmer_registry_demo ?
spp_gis_report ?
spp_grm_demo ?
spp_indicator ?
spp_indicator_studio ?
spp_metric_service ?
spp_mis_demo_v2 ?
spp_programs 65.27% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
spp_registry 86.94% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
spp_security 69.56% <ø> (+2.89%) ⬆️
spp_simulation ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 278 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gonzalesedwin1123
gonzalesedwin1123 merged commit cb7f4c6 into 19.0 Jul 28, 2026
19 checks passed
@gonzalesedwin1123
gonzalesedwin1123 deleted the ci-staging-branch-filters branch July 28, 2026 05:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant