Feature/cstackex 251: New pool type for Netapp iscsi usecase - #95
Open
piyush5netapp wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Feature/cstackex 251: New pool type for Netapp iscsi usecase#95piyush5netapp wants to merge 6 commits into
piyush5netapp wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
piyush5netapp
requested review from
rajiv-jain-netapp,
sandeeplocharla and
suryag1201
as code owners
August 21, 2026 09:31
Author
|
iscsiAdmStorageAdapter ONTAP relevant code will also be pulled into ontapiSCSIAdapter in next commit. |
| StorPool(true, true, EncryptionSupport.Hypervisor), | ||
| FiberChannel(true, true, EncryptionSupport.Unsupported); // Fiber Channel Pool for KVM hypervisors is used to find the volume by WWN value (/dev/disk/by-id/wwn-<wwnvalue>) | ||
| FiberChannel(true, true, EncryptionSupport.Unsupported), // Fiber Channel Pool for KVM hypervisors is used to find the volume by WWN value (/dev/disk/by-id/wwn-<wwnvalue>) | ||
| OntapiSCSI(true, false, EncryptionSupport.Unsupported); // NetApp ONTAP iSCSI: one FlexVol per pool, one LUN per volume |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's not have this comment 'one FlexVol per pool'? As this is bound to change
| * discovers adaptors by a Reflections scan of that package alone, and an unregistered type silently | ||
| * falls back to {@link LibvirtStorageAdaptor} rather than failing at startup. | ||
| */ | ||
| public class OntapIscsiStorageAdaptor extends IscsiAdmStorageAdaptor { |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we planning on changing this to 'implements' with our custom code in the near future?
| !(imageFormat == ImageFormat.RAW && (StoragePoolType.PowerFlex == poolType || | ||
| StoragePoolType.FiberChannel == poolType))) { | ||
| throw new CloudRuntimeException(String.format("Only the following image types are currently supported: %s, %s, %s, %s (for PowerFlex and FiberChannel)", | ||
| StoragePoolType.FiberChannel == poolType || StoragePoolType.OntapiSCSI == poolType))) { |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like this rejects 'iSCSI' pool type also, so, if we did not need this before, do we need this now?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR...
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?