Skip to content

use version expressions for dependency declarations #114

Description

@keturn
  • Is it worth keeping the existing VersionRange class at all, or should we convert entirely?
  • Instead of building an expression out of minVersion, should we allow module metadata to define its own expression?
    • We would need to use the Maven-style expressions in that case in order for compile-time dependency resolution to still work.

Follow-up from #101.


Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Topic: ModuleRequests, Issues and Changes related to gestalt modulesType: ImprovementRequest for or addition/enhancement of a feature

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions