Conversation
Co-authored-by: Katja Weigel <weigel@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de>
Co-authored-by: Felicity Chun <32269066+flicj191@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Romain Beucher <romain.beucher@anu.edu.au>
…a facets from ``~/.esmvaltool/extra_facets/`` (#3137)
…are C-contiguous (#3151)
Co-authored-by: Manuel Schlund <32543114+schlunma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Supriyo Ghosh <supriyo.ghosh@bsc.es>
Co-authored-by: Bouwe Andela <b.andela@esciencecenter.nl>
Co-authored-by: Romain Beucher <romain.beucher@anu.edu.au>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3171 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.22% 96.25% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 273 274 +1
Lines 16150 16189 +39
==========================================
+ Hits 15541 15582 +41
+ Misses 609 607 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
What is the purpose of this pull request?
That was already done in #3120. There is no need to do it again. |
|
Ok, the way the docs sounds is that we want the all the tags in |
|
Thank you for explaining. The only reason we want a tag v2.15.something tag that points to a commit in |
|
I personally think it wouldn't be the worst idea to ensure that all tags are in the main branch. For example, this would ensure that tools like |
|
Thanks! I'll try to update the docs and send through a PR |
Merge tags from
v2.15.xtomainafter 2.15.0 releasemain