Skip to content

Rework CODEOWNERS tests to try and aim for exclusive ownership - #9155

Draft
bouwkast wants to merge 12 commits into
steven/codeowners-9from
steven/codeowners-24-2
Draft

Rework CODEOWNERS tests to try and aim for exclusive ownership#9155
bouwkast wants to merge 12 commits into
steven/codeowners-9from
steven/codeowners-24-2

Conversation

@bouwkast

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Further refines to ensure that every test is exclusively owned by an "owning" team and not a "reviewing" team.

Reason for change

Being asked to reframe teams that are "reviewing" teams such as "tracing-dotnet" to not be the exclusive owner of any test and instead ensure that every single test is owned by some product team.

Implementation details

I went through the /tracer/test directory and files (with a nice and assigned a team, or teams, that I thought "best" owned the file.

Additionally, there are some changes in the tracer/build/_build/Build.VariableGenerations.cs file as we use tracing-dotnet to determine whether to run. Ideally we have a better solution, but we want/need this change sooner rather than later.

tracing-dotnet can / will be added as a "reviewer" team where needed (it is just a co-owner). We have some internal tooling/reporting to differentiate this team as "not an owner"

Test coverage

Other details

Some of these are probably wrong, we should treat this as a iterative improvement / process, but we must ensure that tracing-dotnet / apm-dotnet are not the exclusive owner of any test sooner rather than later.

@bouwkast

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-31T14:16:24.543595Z a0d3f23 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a0d3f23195

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
# We need to update the test logger to fix this.
tracer/ @DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities-dotnet @DataDog/apm-lang-platform-dotnet @DataDog/tracing-dotnet
/tracer/build/ @DataDog/apm-dotnet
/tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.TestHelpers/ @DataDog/apm-lang-platform-dotnet

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Preserve ASM triggering for shared test helpers

When a PR changes a file under Datadog.Trace.TestHelpers, this last-matching rule removes @DataDog/tracing-dotnet, but CommonTracerChanges() only recognizes this explicitly listed shared directory after confirming that its matched owners contain TracingDotnet. Since the rule also lacks @DataDog/asm-dotnet, isAsmChanged remains false and the ASM test matrices are omitted, even though both Security test projects reference this helper project. Retain the tracing co-owner here or make the common-directory check independent of ownership.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried expanding this to be handled.

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-01 14:49:48

Comparing candidate commit 5e25f9c in PR branch steven/codeowners-24-2 with baseline commit 1fc3a46 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 66 known flaky benchmarks, 21 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8082.588op/s; -7257.285op/s] or [-9.584%; -8.605%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7443.951op/s; -6128.677op/s] or [-7.569%; -6.232%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.605KB; +1.605KB] or [+48.760%; +48.776%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+309.250ms; +312.308ms] or [+153.461%; +154.978%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58.250op/s; -53.842op/s] or [-10.480%; -9.687%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.011KB; +1.011KB] or [+37.485%; +37.498%]
  • unstable execution_time [+292.211ms; +352.665ms] or [+230.864%; +278.627%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+71.963op/s; +76.365op/s] or [+9.488%; +10.068%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.090KB; +1.090KB] or [+40.417%; +40.429%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.053ms; +397.685ms] or [+346.952%; +351.936%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60183.635op/s; -59829.731op/s] or [-46.826%; -46.551%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.903ms; -11.706ms] or [-7.427%; -5.467%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60321.836op/s; -57566.793op/s] or [-44.032%; -42.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48781.975op/s; -46502.534op/s] or [-44.105%; -42.044%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-289627.199op/s; -285782.904op/s] or [-29.572%; -29.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.533ms; -21.688ms] or [-11.833%; -9.672%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-116933.711op/s; -92662.354op/s] or [-12.492%; -9.899%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-175511.063op/s; -159106.884op/s] or [-25.218%; -22.861%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72646.553op/s; -71875.791op/s] or [-48.890%; -48.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72293.063op/s; -69378.271op/s] or [-45.999%; -44.144%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-54784.104op/s; -52093.027op/s] or [-43.643%; -41.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+296682.959op/s; +327612.276op/s] or [+9.893%; +10.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.625ms; -15.232ms] or [-9.046%; -7.022%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.238ms; +300.898ms] or [+150.019%; +150.348%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+986.651op/s; +1024.525op/s] or [+10.897%; +11.316%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.045ms; +303.165ms] or [+151.313%; +152.887%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2365.763op/s; +2582.918op/s] or [+18.095%; +19.755%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.843ms; +303.228ms] or [+151.541%; +152.742%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1764.193op/s; +1889.779op/s] or [+17.032%; +18.245%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.981ms; +296.310ms] or [+144.883%; +145.536%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+550.878op/s; +570.840op/s] or [+14.604%; +15.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.609ms; +297.285ms] or [+144.512%; +145.331%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2782.700op/s; +2841.978op/s] or [+40.427%; +41.289%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.623ms; +303.513ms] or [+151.250%; +151.695%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1422.693op/s; +1437.558op/s] or [+28.239%; +28.534%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-147.315µs; -142.901µs] or [-30.246%; -29.339%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+857.015op/s; +887.113op/s] or [+41.741%; +43.206%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-141.367µs; -114.787µs] or [-32.423%; -26.327%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+887.326op/s; +1007.823op/s] or [+38.577%; +43.816%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.835µs; -122.869µs] or [-31.031%; -26.325%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+796.951op/s; +879.214op/s] or [+36.789%; +40.586%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-128.834µs; -125.010µs] or [-34.784%; -33.752%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1388.388op/s; +1427.905op/s] or [+51.419%; +52.883%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-103.298µs; -79.724µs] or [-32.978%; -25.452%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1202.610op/s; +1403.455op/s] or [+37.489%; +43.750%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-137.168µs; -114.784µs] or [-37.524%; -31.400%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1319.909op/s; +1456.658op/s] or [+47.366%; +52.274%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.718ms; +300.498ms] or [+149.590%; +149.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+411.696ms; +420.726ms] or [+447.325%; +457.136%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+694.372op/s; +834.820op/s] or [+5.706%; +6.860%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+296.007ms; +347.842ms] or [+224.756%; +264.113%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.885KB; +2.890KB] or [+5.125%; +5.134%]
  • unstable execution_time [+336.052ms; +379.742ms] or [+154.513%; +174.602%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-530.643op/s; -490.493op/s] or [-48.081%; -44.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+212.512ms; +345.773ms] or [+90.563%; +147.354%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-681.597op/s; -597.672op/s] or [-45.463%; -39.865%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+323.026ms; +341.957ms] or [+193.207%; +204.530%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-409.289op/s; -373.528op/s] or [-28.498%; -26.008%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-188.137µs; -128.984µs] or [-9.530%; -6.534%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38.079op/s; +53.622op/s] or [+7.517%; +10.585%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.492ms; +303.347ms] or [+151.825%; +152.760%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.519ms; +301.520ms] or [+150.089%; +151.092%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.081ms; +306.305ms] or [+152.255%; +153.875%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.408ms; +303.029ms] or [+151.357%; +152.171%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+20964.609op/s; +22870.887op/s] or [+7.023%; +7.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.184ms; +299.055ms] or [+146.450%; +147.869%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.893ms; +303.659ms] or [+151.999%; +153.908%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.393ms; +307.862ms] or [+153.280%; +154.519%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.308ms; +306.833ms] or [+151.171%; +152.928%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+42998.342op/s; +50994.353op/s] or [+8.538%; +10.126%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.865ms; +305.884ms] or [+149.678%; +152.175%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-18369.827op/s; -16932.924op/s] or [-7.387%; -6.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.865ms; -12.182ms] or [-7.377%; -5.665%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+9.896µs; +53.598µs] or [+2.444%; +13.239%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.788KB; -18.765KB] or [-6.853%; -6.845%]
  • unstable execution_time [-27.542µs; +31.225µs] or [-5.444%; +6.171%]
  • unstable throughput [-109.597op/s; +93.811op/s] or [-5.469%; +4.681%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-67.556µs; -7.889µs] or [-11.707%; -1.367%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+5.234µs; +9.905µs] or [+12.371%; +23.412%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4452.448op/s; -2613.850op/s] or [-18.743%; -11.003%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.879µs; -6.939µs] or [-23.084%; -10.766%]
  • unstable throughput [+1831.109op/s; +3540.473op/s] or [+11.234%; +21.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.755ms; +303.104ms] or [+152.524%; +153.206%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.764ms; +308.440ms] or [+155.124%; +156.995%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.818ms; +300.979ms] or [+149.595%; +150.677%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+30689.767op/s; +33312.621op/s] or [+5.809%; +6.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.129ms; +301.293ms] or [+149.089%; +150.168%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.912ms; +303.334ms] or [+151.104%; +152.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.623ms; +306.885ms] or [+154.485%; +155.633%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.074ms; +299.843ms] or [+149.180%; +149.563%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61413340.161op/s; +61719734.810op/s] or [+44.725%; +44.948%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+418.537ms; +422.461ms] or [+520.525%; +525.406%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.454ms; +300.604ms] or [+149.361%; +149.935%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+59131.260op/s; +77623.476op/s] or [+5.521%; +7.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+52496.992op/s; +71403.456op/s] or [+6.076%; +8.265%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+82088.173op/s; +89551.533op/s] or [+8.153%; +8.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+43427.595op/s; +51590.331op/s] or [+7.886%; +9.368%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+72284.482op/s; +92425.309op/s] or [+8.076%; +10.326%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9155) and master.

⚠️ Potential regressions detected

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration201.13 ± (201.15 - 202.03) ms216.68 ± (216.38 - 217.55) ms+7.7%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration206.79 ± (206.24 - 207.27) ms220.56 ± (220.27 - 221.25) ms+6.7%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1206.04 ± (1205.34 - 1212.01) ms1286.23 ± (1284.16 - 1292.45) ms+6.6%❌⬆️

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

bouwkast and others added 2 commits August 31, 2026 11:43
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lock <andrewlock.net@gmail.com>
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/codeowners-9 branch from d66e975 to 751017b Compare August 31, 2026 15:45
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/codeowners-24-2 branch from a0d3f23 to efb2a0e Compare August 31, 2026 15:48
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Aug 31, 2026
Comment thread tracer/build/_build/Build.VariableGenerations.cs
@datadog-datadog-demo-org

This comment has been minimized.

@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/codeowners-9 branch from 751017b to 1c89993 Compare September 1, 2026 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant